Friday 1 January 2016

The mode of limited transposition presented in the spreadsheet below can be thought of as the third of Messiaen’s Mode of Limited Transpositions (MLT).  As usual my preference is simplicity, and some of the potential uses of harmony and melody are given without further comment.


The point of greatest reduction in the mode is the interval pattern 2,1,1  (and the full interval pattern of the scale can be rotated three times). In terms of melodic invention this pattern is less useful than the wealth of harmony available.  To provide examples of its melodic use three short commentaries on British masterworks will be given.  These are the final movement from the Planets, a melody from Bax’s third symphony and the final movement of R.V. Williams’ 6th symphony (also featured in a recent blog).
If the Banquet Celeste is taken as one of the first published works by Messiaen to use MLT then we can safely say that he was working with MLT in general in the 1920’s (Banquet Celeste uses the 8 note mode, interval pattern 1,2,1,2,1,2,1).  The Holst movement Neptune had been completed by 1916. This is not to say that this is the earliest use of MLT, the date is given as a point of interest which relates to another of our blogs concerning the voice of British music.
The first commentary is on the Williams 6th symphony epilogue.  Having already made comments on this movement I shall immediately move to the use of the MLT.  
The opening of the movement uses two of the transpositions, sometimes sharing a note as a pivot between the modes.  

To develop the argument I have taken a later section (rehearsal mark 1) where all three versions are used and marked: those in ink red (1) , green (2) and blue (3). While the linear argument is clear the resultant harmonies are complex ranging from 5/3 triads to diminished and augmented triads and dissonant collections, all of which can be found in this short extract.


In our e-mail discussions on the British voice Nurtan commented on the Neptune movement:
The 7th movement of The Planets by Gustav Holst starts out with limited application of MLT, mainly in defining chords with similar instruments (e.g. Oboe and English Horn b. 12 & 13 followed by flute & bass flute b.14 & 15) and in the woodwind family both vertically and horizontally and in both modes  (b.18-21). The seventh movement of the Planets, Neptune the mystic is played pp by the orchestra throughout the movement. At that dynamic, the texture produced by the repeated application of 211 MLT provides "pockets" of richly dissonant sounds that dissolve into the background. 

This extract uses the first MLT throughout.

The earnest application of MLT starts with 2 harps, 1st and 2nd violins and violas, to be joined by the celesta in b.26. With some breaks this continues until b 31. This treatment recurs regularly throughout the Neptune movement. Even in this short passage of music there is sufficient evidence to confirm the use of the MLT within highly dramatic passages.


The question is bound to arise that even if we change the starting pitches, the MLT only based on 211 interval relationship would be of limited use. In fact there are criticisms of the use of recursive 9 note relationships. Fortunately, by a simple set of rules, the MLT can be extended to a very large number of configurations of the initial interval structure, and this extension would provide a rich resource for melodic invention.
 The statement “the texture produced by the repeated application of 211 MLT provides "pockets" of richly dissonant sounds that dissolve into the background”, could equally well be given to the RVW epilogue.  
The third example is from the opening of Bax’s third symphony where the bassoon provides the melody.  At first the treatment seems akin to the other examples with clarinet and flute imitations of the opening theme, but where the mood of the Holst and Williams’ movements are uniform the Bax quickly moves into a rich Impressionistic landscape.  The intention is to explore this work in greater detail in a later blog, but the connection to the MLT is clear.

As Nurtan says the MLT is a rich resource and capable of extensive use for contemporary composers.

I hope this blog has also illustrated in part the range of material used by English composers who may these days be passed over as less audacious and bold. 

6 comments:

  1. I was fascinated by your article here. "Modes of limited transposition" were things I had heard of, mainly in connection with Messiaen, but till now I had never thought much about them. But when I look more closely, I see that they relate very closely with the Babbitt/Carter classification of pitch class sets which are my own preoccupation. For example, the mode that you would call 2.1.1. would be No. 4-2 in Babbitt's list. Any 3-interval numeration in the Messiaen scheme requires four notes, which are those of any of the four-note pitch class sets of the Babbitt's scheme.

    This is very much in my mind at the moment. I think you have seen - and heard - some of my quartet fragments on each of the 29 pitch class sets of order 4, and if you look at the list on my website you will see that so far I have 17 complete, but a notable absentee in no. 1, which is 1.1.1. How does one write something based on four consecutive semitones which is actually music and not noise? I had a go some time ago, but I withdrew it, partly because it was a bad piece of music, but partly because for anyone looking at my site, the first piece that they would go for was no.1 and I did not want them to be assaulted by a semitonal screech so that they would switch off and go and look for some Mendelssohn instead.. Which, of course, brings up the idea of "limited transposition". The answer is to compose not only with four semitones, but with transposition and inversion too. This I am setting out to do, and hopefully there will be a new no.1. By the way, the chord of semitones is used by Shostakovitch in quartet no.13 just as I suggest - as a screech.

    You talk about RVW's Symphony no.6. I wrote a comment on it in your post a couple of weeks ago. I note also what you say about Bax. I agree that he is neglected, but we have to face the fact that in the present world the audience for that sort of music is declining, and putting on symphonies is very expensive and the only ones put on will be those that can fill a hall. I have just listened to Bax's third symphony and it was the epilogue to the third movement which was obviously the most striking part of it. But that was the trouble with Bax. He did not have to earn his keep by his music, so he has good days and bad days and doesnt trouble to produce music which unifies them.

    One of these days, Ken, I hope I may see one of your articles on Edmund Rubbra. He deserves not to be forgotten.



    ReplyDelete
  2. I take your point about Bax and concert halls, but there are excellent symphonic cycles on disc, sadly these have not done much to revitalise interest in his music. I think that as one gets to know the workings of each symphony well enough to hear the connections between the emotionally different passages the wholeness of the music becomes increasingly evident, especially as third movements often continue thematic links from the first. Many of the middle movements are remarkable in their own right. Then we have the "is it a one movement symphony or a tone poem" question to deal with.
    The question of writing a movement on limited material that is to your liking and satisfaction is not one I can help with, though I would imagine there is plenty of room for creative work within even this level of restriction. However you could work the series of pieces from 29 to zero, with no.1 being very short and zero a bar of silence at the end. There is a great satisfaction to be had when a project on a larger scale comes to its natural conclusion. I found the tonal piece "Zodiac for 2 pianos" at times awkward to work with, each part taking a particular key in a full cycle. Somehow the idea of just transposing a section into another key and slotting it into the framework did not work at all.
    To be honest I am not well informed about Rubbra, having named my son Edmund (I insisted that my wife choose a Welsh name!) perhaps I should make the effort. It is a good idea, once I get my head around Brian's "Gothic" I'll search out some discs. I would quite like to hear the film music bt Bax for Oliver Twist, do you know of any available copies of the full recording?

    As always good to hear from you,
    Ken

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting comments Tony. Also Rubbra is on the list. Oliver Twwist (original) isn available some netflix providers, Roku and A few archives. The sound quality is poor to fair.
    rEGARDS
    Nurtan

    ReplyDelete
  4. This article is excellent! thanks for sharing the information in such clear manner
    btw: happy new year 2016! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. and a happy and prosperous new year to you Martin.
    Thank you for your comment. The third mode turning up in early to mid-20th century English music was a surprise, you may notice that I examined the first movement of the third Bax symphony to show how the mode undergoes a metamorphosis, you might be interested enough to listen to the music, if you do, listen to the last 5 or 6 minutes of the third movement, a remarkable piece of orchestral writing.
    I have been analysing a mazurka by Chopin, and I am reworking the structure with the third mode as a second part to a string quartet (the first is on G+ as Dreams in extreme old age). I am hoping it will make a link sufficient to show how memories become confused. it may work, we shall see.
    I am talking about myself again, but it is with the hope that you might take a compositional look at the Modes of LT yourself, there's a lot of useful material to generate from the structure.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Having read that post again I should point out there is an additional blog with a commentary on the Bax symphony No. 3 first movement. What age does to reasoning and recall!

    ReplyDelete